- Have any questions?
- 0174-9077347
- fejsa@gmx.de
Fallanalyse Tracey Splinter, Mord: Manager-Geliebte in Chur, ihm nach Vals in Familienurlaub nachgereist, Doppelleben gefährdet, tot ?
8. Januar 2021
Snapchat-Killer (Abby and Libby) 4 Jahre Ermittlungs-Irrsinn, die Wander-Geschwindigkeit ums Dreifache zu niedrig angesetzt. Die Mädchen gingen wohl ganz anders.
12. Januar 2021
Preface
Did you know, that the question is:
At the end of the following article you can know why….
.
Article
The extraordinary good job of investigator Gray Hughes made my insights possible. He is a superstar of prepatory work, his precise data made my revolutionary analysis possible and to show, where ALL went wrong.
================================================
Insertion:
Gray Hughes is answering with “LMAO”, “laughing my ass of”. OK, I said he did good PREPATORY work, this is my position. But like an idiot he stays there and is not willing to recognize his master. In this moment he puts himself in a position of an enemy of the truth.
Gray Hughes showed potential to be usefull servant, but in the Moment he is leaving the guiding hand of someone like me, he is a threat, because he is stupid and talented the same time. He is not clever enough for a real good analysis, he only can contribute parts.
But with an attitude like he showed now, he is more harmfull to success in an crime case than normal, unintelligent idiots. Because he is intelligent, but not enough.
An apology one day would not change this analysis.
==================================================
.
Call it hiking:
Not 550 m in 22 Minutes (=1,5 km/h), but 1850 m in 22 Minutes (= 5 km/h)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_walking_speed
The preferred walking speed is the speed at which humans or animals choose to walk. Many people tend to walk at about 1.4 metres per second (5.0 km/h)
Someone may say now: Well, they were taking photos, blablabla…
This is not a likely explanation for this much time …
Of course the old version of ALL the others still COULD be, but there is more circumstantial evidence. We look to it later. This is the Moment to watch my video here
.
So at this point I want to show my mail that I have sent to the US-Media in June 2020.
Today I know more thanks of Gray Hughes, but allready then I looked to the place, where the killer saw the girls first and this was at the BEGINNING of the trail and I think, the killer was not a hiker and at this point of time not especially on the hunt for girls, but he was triggered when he saw the girls accidentally from outside the trail while he was following his daily business.
.
This was in June 2020. Then these days I came back to the snapchat-case and saw the videos of Gray Hughes.
There I realized, Gray Hughes is so precise but even Wikipedia is wrong.
Wikipedia tells us
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murders_of_Abigail_Williams_and_Liberty_German
At 1:35 p.m. on February 13, 2017, 13-year-old Abigail J. „Abby“ Williams and 14-year-old Liberty Rose Lynn „Libby“ German were dropped off by German’s older sister, Kelsi German, at a trailhead on County Road 300 North, west of the Hoosier Heartland Highway.
All is wrong here with Wikipedia, the TIME is wrong and the place is wrong.
But Gray Hughes, seems to be right.
But now it comes to the mistake, I am sure all had made.
The girls where just hiking at a normal hiking-speed of 5 km/h and so they made 1850 m in 22 Minutes and not only 550 m
Seems they were „correct hikers“, starting a trail at its start. Of course you could do it in an other way, but this way all, the whole case, is conclusive.
So I am back to my first theory:
Or what is with the building next to it?
OK, so far my theory of the crime. This provides a revolutionary new chance to solve the crime, there is now a new area of highest interest.
.
.
.
In the following I show two extraordinary helpfull videos of Gray Hughes
.
.
.
.
At Min 17:28 of the second Video important informations are starting about a witness who saw the suspect coming from the east, the direction of the crime sceene, aiming to west, meeting the witness here:
Why did he come back? Why did he risk to be seen by witnesses?
My explanation is, that he was involved in some business at these buildings I spoke of and there must have been his car. This is the reason, he came back.
This is a sensational new analysis after all these years, lets hope, that the case will be solved now.
Here down below my tip to the police.
In germany this would mean, that idiots would shit and trample like pigs on pearls.
With US-media I have the same experience, with US-authorities I have no experience, not good, not bad. So lets see …
.
After sending this tip to the police, i have sent it also to someone else.The following dialog lastest hours and in this time I made efforts for argumentation that shall not be in vain.
So 100 % anonymous I no now use only my own text during a part of this dialog. I dont quote anything that the person wrote nor informations about his identity, it was just a private person, speaking english language.
Because at the end of the dialog, I was more wise than at the beginning. While having an exchange of argumentes, I myself was „growing“ , my conclusions got better and this I want to document here. And right in the next lines I write “ … He could be a visitor of my main focus buildings, there he saw the girls…“
This means: From the property of these buildings you might see in winter when there are no leaves good this 30 meters to the trail. When there would be a wall and you dont see the trail from these properties, then this would not work, this I dont know from google…
My favourit theory is a visitor of the properties near the trail.
.
.
So this has to do with this articel about a car here
.
So the question is:
.
So lets update the tip:
.
Klaus Fejsa
"Kriminalistischer Mitdenker: Klaus F. hatte auch im Tötungsfall Michelle eine entscheidende Idee, die anfangs niemand ernst nahm, sich letztendlich jedoch als richtig herausstellte." .......
Südwest-Presse Artikel am 19.10.2012
