OK, new facts would be new facts, then I give in in the point of pineapple. I am able to change my mind when I have new informations.
A battle with Burke in the night about some pineapples was published as a possible reason for her killing, so pineapple in the night would have to fit to the examiners.
If this s wrong, I got false informations, but I never did a logical mistake in a criminal case, I can not remind a single one.
So the pineapple stuff is worth nothing, then she COULD be stun in bed.
When was she hit?
The hit ended the plan of a kidnapping because from this moment on, it was a dying child.
In the basement, her body was placed in the suitcase, the fibers showed it.
Placing her in the suitcase was a act during the plan of kidnapping.
So she was hit AFTER she was put in a suitcase, so putting her in the suitcase was done to transport her like this to a waiting car outside.
WHY was she hit?
Because of panic , even with duct-tape in the suitcase, she could make too much noise, because she was not gagged.
She was hit, when they reopened the suitcase. She was NOT hit before she was put in the suitcase.
So the moment of pineapple and the moment of stunning are both unimportant. Important is the moment of the hit in relation to the suitcase as a clear indication for the kidnapping motive and all the insider knowledge in this case that point to a group around H-P.
… Sometime I have missing infos, then I can correct myself. But when I got the right infos, I do the best reconstruction work …..